Staying Alive Off Piste

I was asked to review this book with a view to inclusion in the yearbook I believe but it arrived with me too late for inclusion so I thought it might be worth putting this up on the website so that people can get hold of it before the season begins if they wish.

Staying Alive Off Piste!

This little book is available as a print on demand £6.99 or Kindle £1.98 from http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-lias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=staying+alive+off+piste&x=0&y=0. In it Doug Gurr & Barry Roberts, of Wilderness Medical Training, have tried to provide a classification of the risks involved in the off piste environment and the measures that can be taken to manage those risks.
As they point out, around 300 skiers, boarders and climbers die in off piste accidents every year and an analysis of the figures produces 5 categories of risk, in descending order: avalanche; steep ground (falls); cold; getting lost; crevasses. The book deals with each of these risks and provides the information that can significantly reduce the danger involved with each of them. The tone is informal  and readable but it’s an instructional book and as such becomes technical in places, so it’s fortunate that the text is double-spaced, well-organised and divided into clear sections. The advice is sound and straightforward with a deliberate emphasis on keeping things simple to provide a bedrock of knowledge upon which to build the details of experience. Reading the book section by section with breaks to review should avoid information overload whilst end of section summaries and catch phrases like “speed is safety” and “light is right” reinforce key points.
Unfortunately better proof-reading should have been undertaken before publication and it does take a moment or two to decipher phrases like, “its its still much easier that pulling on the rope.” On page 153 the same paragraph is printed twice. It’s also a pity that there aren’t more diagrams and photos to clarify some of the technical descriptions of crevasse rescue technique: figure 22, the illustration of “Essential Kit,” misses out the ropeman that is specifically recommended in the text, substituting a tibloc that is not mentioned at all and will not take the ropeman’s place as an autobloc. The photos and illustrations are the weakest element of the book, being uniformly indistinct except for the striking cover photo. This is no luxury option but an opportunity missed as far as clarifying and extending the relevance of the text.
The final section on “Other Stuff” reads like a collection of afterthoughts that do not really do justice to any of the subjects covered, although, as you might expect, the first aid section is much better than the rest. The comments on nutrition and fluid intake seem to some extent to be undermining “the mantra of light is right.” In general even the slimmest skiers are carrying enough surplus fat to keep going for a couple of weeks on a calorie deficit in your average expeditionary situation and fluid intake can become a vicious cycle when carrying a lot of water results in excessive water loss through sweating.
A short handbook like this can’t cover everything but it does provide the basics of a survival kit for the newcomer to off piste. There are longer more detailed books about avalanches for example and the book refers to some of these for further reading but I have no doubt that if this book is widely read and referred to it will save lives.

On the topic of staying alive, this avalanche analysis for the French Alps last season is well worth reading:

http://pistehors.com/news/ski/comments/1053-french-avalanche-analysis-for-2011-12/

John,

I had exactly the same thoughts, but lack the real experience to comment, as you have.

I am more scared of potential slab avalanche than of avalanche from any other source, as they are so unpredictable.

 

Steve

 

Don't know if this helps but I've found really high winds can have the effect of blowing away the new snow from massive areas of the mountains. To give an example:

Last year I was pinned down by blizzards with very strong winds for 3 days at the Goriz hut at the head of the Ordesa canyon. We had to dig out the path to the outside loo repeatedly and avalanche danger was reported at 5 so it was a very tentative team that left to see what conditions were like on the mountain on the first clear day that followed. Despite the heavy snowfall the surface was clear down to where our tracks of 3 days earlier could easily be seen. There was very little deposition high up on the southern aspects of the mountains. I think the lower valley slopes would have been dangerous but we made an ascent of Pico Marbore and Pico de Cascade with minimal concerns about snow conditions, then returned over the Breche de Roland next day and found where all the snow had gone (so were very careful!).

Maybe its that no one died, so nothing to report. Big Picture?

Windslabs probably exisited like your saying john, but being early season not many people where sking. Those that did venture out in the harsh winds where probably pretty keen and good at choosing safe routes etc... so no one got caught. Windslab are predictable and heal realtivley quick compared to a well preserved weak layer like surface hoar or a bunch of cold facets.

The comment could be trying to say because of the winds the avalanche hazard wasn't as high as it could have been during the holiday season. There was a potential for a lot of accidents but "whew we got away with that one!" said the french forecastor.

That's my take on it, does that make sense?  

 

Good review, thanks Dave.

Totally agree John, well spotted.

Looking back at my post I was trying to be brief and in doing I wasn't really clear.

 

Meant to say

Windslabs on the surface(Top 50cm) are a lot more predictable and heal quicker compared to a slab( say 90cm+) that  sits on a preserved persistent weak layer like: surface hoar, facets or depth hoar.
 
 
 
Surface slabs we can feel what there doing under our skis and pole and see loading in action, deeper weak layers are just harder to keep track off.

 

Sorry about the confusion. 

 

 

Owen